history
Population control in China
by Miguel Diaz
Wed 14 Jan 2004 00:25:13
According to <a href="http://www.oneworld.net">Oneworld.net</a> China will be <a href="http://southasia.oneworld.net/article/view/76618/1/">doing away with child quotas</a>. Apparently this all stems from work the <a href="http://www.unfpa.org">United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA)</a> has been doing throught China to promote other forms of birth control.
I've never actually been to China like some of you have, so I'll leave commentary on their political situation to those who are better informed than myself; but I'd have to say this is a huge win for human rights across the board. More freedom for couples to make choices about the families they raise, more freedom for women to make their own (hopefully informed) decisions about birth control, no more killing of female offspring in favor of males. Apparently the UN CAN do something right.
Naturally, <a href="http://www.pritchettcartoons.com/bush2.htm">Bush</a> managed to worm his way into this story as well. His administration is witholding millions of dollars in funding from UNFPA. "Why?" you ask? Well, I'll <a href="http://www.agi-usa.org/pubs/journals/gr050413.html">tell you</a>. Anti-birth control groups successfully convinced the slow-witted one that simply by having a program in China, UNFPA was contributing to the "coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization" generally attributed to current Chinese population control guidelines. Now IANAL, but to me it sounds like those are exactly the types of things that UNFPA is trying to move China away from. My guess is either Bush couldn't read what he was given, or they caught him while he was strung out. Although, he IS actually that evil, so he may have known what he was doing. He probably figured it was an easy way to finance a few more bombs to drop on unsuspecting <a href="http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/insight/articles/eav070302.shtml">Afghan weddings</a>.
comments
emile - Wed 14 Jan 2004 00:26:13
bush has been anti-birth control from the get go. if he gets lucky, he'll even manage to promote enough supreme court justices in his way of thinking to overturn '73 roe v wade. evil (or good from a "leviticus" point of view...)punany - Tue 12 Oct 2004 12:40:05
entirely tooo long thank youK. Richards - Wed 03 Nov 2004 10:24:51
please dont talk about bush this way he is doing a great job in this field and i feel that you need to read up more on your facts about the control methods that china has had in earlier years thank youDeepCerulean - Wed 03 Nov 2004 11:19:31
First and foremost: Bush is a fuckwad. Secondly: RTFA.TC - Thu 04 Nov 2004 13:27:08
Ha ha. Angry people. I never liked bagels that much, but there was a time when I found myself eating them regularly... with strawberry jam... I don't like cream cheese - never will. Mor eon topic... Do any of you think that Bush may have had a personal connection with abortion? I'm willing to gamble on the odds that he got someone pregnant, and was relieved that she had an abortion. Or maybe his people just had her "erased." Hmmm? I don't understand why I don't like cream cheese at all. So many people seem to like it enough to have more cream cheese than they have bagel, and some people frost cakes with it. Maybe I should force myself to eat it until something just clicks inside of me... shrivvles up and dies and I accept it like the black cock I learned to live with in prison. Okay... that was a lie. I didn't learn to accept the BC in prison... it was elementary school bullies. But that place felt like a prison! THis is silly now.Anonymous - Sun 07 Nov 2004 01:56:16
couldnt have said it better